Clinical Audit for Integration of Communicable and Non-Communicable Diseases at the Primary Health Care Level in Tanzania
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Poor quality of health care services remains an important challenge in health care delivery systems. Here, we validate clinical audit tools and describe audit results of selected clinical standards related to communicable disease (CD) and non-communicable disease (NCD) integration at the primary health care level.
Methodology: A multi-methods approach, including a retrospective cohort and cross-sectional design, was deployed concurrently at Health Centres. Separate evaluators assessed the Health Centres using an audit tool and the inter-rater/inter-observer reliability was estimated. The extent of adherence to clinical standards was measured in proportions for: infection prevention control, tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis including advanced TB/HIV, the diagnosis of chronic lung diseases, and the bidirectional screening and clinical management of TB and Diabetes Mellitus (DM).
Results: The inter-rater reliability for the clinical audit tools based on 130 individuals’ charts was 99.5% (CI:99-100). The total estimated maximum score for infection prevention control was 114 and on average health centres scored 42 (37%). Only 3 (4%) of 80 individuals’ medical charts with unexplained productive cough were evaluated for TB. None of the 24 individuals with HIV infection medical charts had vitals measured and only 6 (25%) patients with advanced HIV had a TB test performed, whereas 4 (17%) had a cryptococcal antigen test, and 1 (4%) had a chest radiograph. Also, 24 patients’ chart from documented HIV negative with chronic cough had no records of spirometry or peak flowmeter or a chest radiograph. However, a diagnosis of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as made in 17 (71%) and 7 (29%), respectively. TB was confirmed for 102 patients among whom only 12(12%) were screened for DM. The DM clinics had no TB presumptive registers. Patients with TB/DM (n=2) had a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) measurement done and received appropriate management.
Conclusion and recommendation: The developed clinical audit tools were reliable and could contribute to quality measurement for metrics-related integration of CD and NCD in Tanzania. Further investigations will determine if the clinical audit tools widely used in cycles can improve the quality of care in health care delivery systems.